Re: [RFC][patch 0/2] mm: remove PageReserved

[Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>]

Hugh Dickins wrote:

> You're right (though I imagine might sometimes be holes rather than RAM).

Yep. These holes are what I have in mind, and random other things
like the !(bad_ppro && page_kills_ppro(pfn)) check.

[...]

> I think Nick is treating the "use" of PageReserved in ioremap much too
> reverentially.  Fine to leave its removal from there to a later stage,
> but why shouldn't that also be removed?

Well, as far as I had been able to gather, ioremap is trying to
ensure it does indeed only hit one of these holes, and not valid
RAM. I thought the fact that it *won't* bail out when encountering
kernel text or remap_pfn_range'ed pages was only due to PG_reserved
being the proverbial jack of all trades, master of none.

I could be wrong here though.

But in either case: I agree that it is probably not a great loss
to remove the check, although considering it will be needed for
swsusp anyway...

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/