On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 12:49:17AM +0200, Adrian Bunk took 42 lines to write:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 02:33:00PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> >
> > You may as well change the S: to unmaintained whilst
> > you're there, it hasn't seen any updates in a long time,
> > and still uses several out-of-date SCSI APIs.
>
> Or he could completely remove the entry.
>
> We don't have entries for every single unmaintained driver, and the
> smaller MAINTAINERS is the higher is the possibility of not missing a
> relevant entry when checking whom to send an email.
Hmm, so if a subsystem or driver (more drivers, I should think) lacks
an entry in MAINTAINERS, is it then reasonable to assume that it is
unmaintained? If not, perhaps creating a separate list of unmaintained
subsystems and/or drivers is prudent?
Kurt
--
Don't get even -- get odd!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |