Re: [PATCH] i386 No-Idle-Hz aka Dynamic-Ticks 5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:38:23AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> It should not matter when the PIT gets reprogrammed, as the system time is
> not updated from PIT timer. Jiffies are calculated from a second timer, such
> as ACPI PM timer or TSC.

I am more worried about timer latencies and its effects. Because of this skew 
between when jiffy interrupt was originally supposed to happen and when it 
will now happen, it can lead to, for example, scheduling latencies upto
1 jiffy (for HZ=100, that could hurt some apps?) Not to mention that
this will not play well with high-res-timers, but that is probably
not a concern now!


-- 


Thanks and Regards,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM Software Labs,
Bangalore, INDIA - 560017
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux