Re: [PATCH 1/8] Move MSR accessors into the sub-arch layer

* H. Peter Anvin ([email protected]) wrote:
> I would like to strongly request one addition, however: please make it 
> so that a subarchitecture which is still a hardware architecture doesn't 
> have to redefine all of these every time.

Yep, that's done.  As long as the defaults are ok, the subarch doesn't
need to override them.  So I think that request is met.

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/8] Move MSR accessors into the sub-arch layer
    • From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/8] Move MSR accessors into the sub-arch layer
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/8] Move MSR accessors into the sub-arch layer
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] make visual workstation subarch link again
• Next by Date: Re: gcapatcch equivalent?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Move MSR accessors into the sub-arch layer
• Next by thread: [PATCH 2/8] Move privileged processor operations to the subarch layer
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]