Re: [PATCH] 3/8 Move sensitive system definitions into the sub-arch layer

* Zachary Amsden ([email protected]) wrote:
> i386 Transparent Paravirtualization Subarch Patch #3
> 
> This change encapsulates privileged control register and flags accessors into
> the sub-architecture layer.  The goal is a clean, uniform interface that may
> be redefined on new sub-architectures of i386.

I had cheated on this on and the io insn's and pushed the whole thing to
subarch.  That's only from lack of time, so I'll revisit this one
tomorrow.

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] 3/8 Move sensitive system definitions into the sub-arch layer
  - From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/8] Move privileged processor operations to the subarch layer
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] 6/8 Move sensitive I/O instructions into the sub-arch layer
Previous by thread: [PATCH] 3/8 Move sensitive system definitions into the sub-arch layer
Next by thread: [PATCH] 4/8 Move TLB flush definitions to the sub-architecture level
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]