Re: [PATCH] remove i386 dynamic ticks ifdefs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> I assume you're maintaining the dyn tick patches for i386 posted on the muru 
> website as your email is listed there. I thought you might be interested in 
> this patch for dyn-ticks which removes most of the #ifdefs out of common code 
> paths as per linux kernel style and moves more code into dyn-tick.c. Most of 
> it is straight forward code reorganisation, but to keep do_timer_interrupt 
> inlined I'd have to move it's code around somewhat. That may be a better 
> option but I've tried to fiddle with the mainline code as little as possible.
> 
> Patch applies to 2.6.12 with patch-dynamic-tick-2.6.12-rc6-050610-1 applied
> 
> cc'ed lkml just for public record of the patch.

Please inline patches...

You broke indentation in one of first hunks, and you probably
want empty functions to be static inline, so that we do not eat
function call overhead.
				Pavel
-- 
64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms         

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux