On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 11:26 -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 07:53:58PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 10:32 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > > I would like to get people's reactions to moving the InfiniBand .h
> > > files from their current location in drivers/infiniband/include/ to
> > > include/linux/rdma/. If we agree that this is a good idea then I'll
> > > push this change as soon as 2.6.14 starts.
> >
> > please only put userspace clean headers here; the rest is more or less
> > private headers for your subsystem.
>
> Sorry...this smells like a rathole...but does this mean
> linus agrees the kernel subsystems should export headers suitable for
> both user space and kernel driver modules?
>
> Historical, I thought glibc and other user space libs were expected to
> maintain their own set of header files. Maybe I'm just confused...
there is a definite requirement for the kernel to expose SOME things to
userspace. Well for SOMETHING to expose them. Right now most distros
ship a hacked up version of the kernel headers (eg removed of all the
kernel specific stuff and all the gpl inline code etc). A good part of
making such an external project possible is to make a clean separation
between userspace shared stuff and pure kernel internals.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|