On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 10:32 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > I would like to get people's reactions to moving the InfiniBand .h > files from their current location in drivers/infiniband/include/ to > include/linux/rdma/. If we agree that this is a good idea then I'll > push this change as soon as 2.6.14 starts. I think it is a great idea. > The advantages of doing this are: > > - The headers become more easily accessible to other parts of the > tree that might want to use IB support. For example, an NFS/RDMA > client probably wants to live under fs/ > - It makes it easier to build IB modules outside the tree, since > include/linux gets put in /lib/modules/<ver>/build. I realize > that we don't really care about out-of-tree modules, but it is > convenient to be able to develop and distribute new drivers that > build against someone's existing kernels. > - We can kill off the ugly > > EXTRA_CFLAGS += -Idrivers/infiniband/include > > lines in our Makefiles. One more advantage: - It shows our willingness to push past just infiniband. -tduffy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- [RFC] Move InfiniBand .h files
- From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- [RFC] Move InfiniBand .h files
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.13-rc4 - kernel panic - BUG at net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:918
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Move InfiniBand .h files
- Previous by thread: [RFC] Move InfiniBand .h files
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Move InfiniBand .h files
- Index(es):