On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 07:04 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Richard Purdie wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 17:19 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > Could you try the following patch? I think the problem was that higher
> > > addressses were not mappable via the page fault handler. This patch
> > > inserts the pmd entry into the pgd as necessary if the pud level is
> > > folded.
> >
> > I tried this patch against 2.6.13-rc4-mm1 and there was no change - X
> > still hung in memcpy as before and the cmpxchg_fail_flag_update just
> > increases...
>
> Is there some way you can give us more information about the problem?
> Something that would allow us to determine where the thing is looping?
I'm at a disadvantage here as the linux mm system is one area I've
avoided getting too deeply involved with so far. My knowledge is
therefore limited and I won't know what correct or incorrect behaviour
would look like.
We know the the failure case can be identified by the
cmpxchg_fail_flag_update condition being met. Can you provide me with a
patch to dump useful debugging information when that occurs?
Richard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|