On 8/3/05, Hans Kristian Rosbach <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 00:50 -0400, James Bruce wrote:
> > Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 12:18:18PM -0400, James Bruce wrote:
> > >>The tradeoff is a realistic 4.4% power savings vs a 300% increase in
> > >>the minimum sleep period. A user will see zero power savings if they
> > >>have a USB mouse (probably 99% of desktops). On top of that, we can
> > ^^^^^^^^
> >
> > > Most laptops (including mine, a Thinkpad T40) use a PS/2 mouse. So in
> > > the places where power consumption savins matters most, it's usually
> > > quite possible to function without needing any USB devices. The 90%
> > > figure isn't at all right; in fact, it may be that over 90% of the
> > > laptops still use PS/2 mice and keyboards.
> >
> > Yes, laptops are mostly PS/2, which is why I only claimed a statistic
> > for desktops. Desktops pretty much all use USB mice now. If 250Hz were
> > only being sold as an option for laptops, we could leave it at that, yet
> > its being pushed as a default that's "good for everyone". For desktops
> > this is not currently true at all. By the time USB is fixed to do power
> > saving, we'll probably have a working tick-skipping patch which makes
> > the whole HZ argument moot.
>
> Most new laptops are moving away from PS/2 ports, for example my
> shining (literally) new Acer Ferrari 4005 only has USB2 ports for mice
> and keyboard inputs (unless in the optional pcie docking station maybe).
> So my suggestion would be to fix USB power management.
>
You are talking about external ports. I am pretty sure that installed
keyboard and touchpad (or whattever pointing device it has) are plain
old PS/2.
--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|