Re: [PATCH] i386 No-Idle-Hz aka Dynamic-Ticks 3

On Wednesday 03 August 2005 07:59, Con Kolivas wrote:
> This is the dynamic ticks patch for i386 as written by Tony Lindgen
> <[email protected]> and Tuukka Tikkanen <[email protected]>.
> Patch for 2.6.13-rc5
>

Compiles and runs ok here.

Is there actually any timer frequency that's advisable to set as maximum? (in 
the kernel config)

Jan
-- 
To stand and be still,
At the Birkenhead drill,
Is a damned tough bullet to chew.
		-- Rudyard Kipling
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] i386 No-Idle-Hz aka Dynamic-Ticks 3
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] i386 No-Idle-Hz aka Dynamic-Ticks 3
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 2.6.13-rc4] fix get_user_pages bug
• Next by Date: Re: Calling suspend() in halt/restart/shutdown -> not a good idea
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] i386 No-Idle-Hz aka Dynamic-Ticks 3
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386 No-Idle-Hz aka Dynamic-Ticks 3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]