Re: ahci, SActive flag, and the HD activity LED

Jens Axboe wrote:

If I am reading the specs correctly, that'd mean the ahci driver iswrong in setting the SActive bit.
I completely agree, that was my reading of the spec as well and hence my
original posts about this in the NCQ thread.

Have you (or has anybody else) also seen the wrong behavior of theactivity LED?


Regards
Martin

--
Martin Wilck                Phone: +49 5251 8 15113
Fujitsu Siemens Computers   Fax:   +49 5251 8 20409
Heinz-Nixdorf-Ring 1        mailto:[email protected]
D-33106 Paderborn           http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/primergy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ahci, SActive flag, and the HD activity LED
  - From: Matthias Schniedermeyer <[email protected]>
- Re: ahci, SActive flag, and the HD activity LED
  - From: Adam Goode <[email protected]>
- Re: ahci, SActive flag, and the HD activity LED
  - From: André Tomt <[email protected]>
- Re: ahci, SActive flag, and the HD activity LED
  - From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <[email protected]>
- Re: ahci, SActive flag, and the HD activity LED
  - From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

References:
- ahci, SActive flag, and the HD activity LED
  - From: Martin Wilck <[email protected]>
- Re: ahci, SActive flag, and the HD activity LED
  - From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH] Xmon bug fix for soft-reset
Next by Date: [PATCH] Fix for kexec boot issue
Previous by thread: Re: ahci, SActive flag, and the HD activity LED
Next by thread: Re: ahci, SActive flag, and the HD activity LED
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]