On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 09:55 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Any objections to the patch below? I posted it last Wednesday,
> but haven't heard anything. Once we have this fix, 8250_pnp
> should have sufficient functionality that we can get rid of
> 8250_acpi.
>
>
>
> Use types that match the ACPI resource structures. Previously
> the u64 value from an RSTYPE_ADDRESS64 was passed as an int,
> which corrupts the value.
>
> This is one of the things that prevents 8250_pnp from working
> on HP ia64 boxes. After 8250_pnp works, we will be able to
> remove 8250_acpi.c.
We might always use 'unsigned long'. Did you have plan to remove other
legacy acpi drivers?
Thanks,
Shaohua
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |