Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers

Lee Revell wrote:

On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 09:10 -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:

Maybe new desktop systems - but what about the tens of millions of old
systems that don't.



Does anyone really give a shit about saving power on the desktop anyway?
This is basically a laptop issue.



Power consumption matters to server, desktop, and laptop.

Assuming this is a laptop issue is wildly incorrect.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
  - From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
  - From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
  - From: James Bruce <[email protected]>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
  - From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
  - From: James Bruce <[email protected]>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
  - From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
  - From: David Weinehall <[email protected]>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
  - From: James Bruce <[email protected]>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
  - From: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
  - From: James Bruce <[email protected]>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
  - From: Stephen Clark <[email protected]>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Calling suspend() in halt/restart/shutdown -> not a good idea
Next by Date: Re: Calling suspend() in halt/restart/shutdown -> not a good idea
Previous by thread: Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
Next by thread: Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]