On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 13:23 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> As I said, I do not care about default value. And you should not care,
> too, since distros are likely to pick their own defaults.
If the default value does not matter then the default should remain at
1000 so as to not violate the principle of least surprise for people who
run "make oldconfig". Why is this so hard for people to understand?
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- From: James Bruce <bruce@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- From: James Bruce <bruce@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- From: David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- From: James Bruce <bruce@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]