Re: [patch] i386 dynamic ticks 2.6.13-rc4 (code reordered)

On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 15:49 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> As a crude data point of idle system running a full kde desktop
> environment on 
> powersave with minimal backlight and just chatting on IRC I find it's
> just 
> under 10% battery life difference.

Have you tried the same test but without artsd, or with it configured to
release the sound device after some reasonable time, like 1-2s?  

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] i386 dynamic ticks 2.6.13-rc4 (code reordered)
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] i386 dynamic ticks 2.6.13-rc4 (code reordered)
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] i386 dynamic ticks 2.6.13-rc4 (code reordered)
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] i386 dynamic ticks 2.6.13-rc4 (code reordered)
• Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] remove support for gcc < 3.2
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] i386 dynamic ticks 2.6.13-rc4 (code reordered)
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] i386 dynamic ticks 2.6.13-rc4 (code reordered)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]