On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> Any chance you can change the __follow_page test to account for
> writeable clean ptes? Something like
>
> if (write && !pte_dirty(pte) && !pte_write(pte))
> goto out;
>
> And then you would re-add the set_page_dirty logic further on.
Hmm.. That should be possible. I wanted to do the simplest possible code
sequence, but yeah, I guess there's nothing wrong with allowing the code
to dirty the page.
Somebody want to send me a proper patch? Also, I haven't actually heard
from whoever actually noticed the problem in the first place (Robin?)
whether the fix does fix it. It "obviously does", but testing is always
good ;)
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |