Re: [patch 2.6.13-rc4] fix get_user_pages bug

[Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>]

On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> that "continue" will continue without the spinlock held, and now do 

Yes, I was at last about to reply on that point and others.
I'll make those comments in a separate mail to Nick and all.

> Instead, I'd suggest changing the logic for "lookup_write". Make it 
> require that the page table entry is _dirty_ (not writable), and then 

Attractive, I very much wanted to do that rather than change all the
arches, but I think s390 rules it out: its pte_mkdirty does nothing,
its pte_dirty just says no.

Whether your patch suits all other uses of (__)follow_page I've not
investigated (and I don't see how you can go without the set_page_dirty
if it was necessary before); but at present see no alternative to
something like Nick's patch, though I'd much prefer smaller.

Or should we change s390 to set a flag in the pte just for this purpose?

Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/