Hi!
> > > I really like having 250HZ as an _option_, but what I don't see is why
> > > it should be the _default_. I believe this is Lee's position as
> > > Last I checked, ACPI and CPU speed scaling were not enabled by default;
> >
> > Kernel defaults are irelevant; distros change them anyway. [But we
> > probably want to enable ACPI and cpufreq by default, because that
> > matches what 99% of users will use.]
> >
>
> If the kernel defaults are irrelevant, then it would make more sense to
> leave the default HZ as 1000 and not to enable the cpufreq and ACPI in
> order to keep with the principle of least surprise for people who do use
> kernel.org kernels.
Well, I'd say you want ACPI enabled. New machine do not even boot
without that. Default config should be usefull; set ACPI off, and
you'll not be able to even power machine down.
Pavel
--
if you have sharp zaurus hardware you don't need... you know my address
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|