>From 2.6.13-rc4 this hunk +#else +# define rt_hash_lock_addr(slot) NULL +# define rt_hash_lock_init() +#endif Doesn't work with the following, + spin_unlock(rt_hash_lock_addr(i)); Cause your spin locking a NULL .. I would give a patch, but I'm not sure what should be done in this case.. Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: hashed spinlocks
- From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
- Re: hashed spinlocks
- References:
- Re: Add prefetch switch stack hook in scheduler function
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- RE: Add prefetch switch stack hook in scheduler function
- From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <[email protected]>
- Re: Add prefetch switch stack hook in scheduler function
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Add prefetch switch stack hook in scheduler function
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Add prefetch switch stack hook in scheduler function
- From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
- Re: Add prefetch switch stack hook in scheduler function
- Prev by Date: [2.6 patch] arch/sh64/Kconfig: doesn't need it's own LOG_BUF_SHIFT
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] speed up on find_first_bit for i386 (let compiler do the work)
- Previous by thread: Re: Add prefetch switch stack hook in scheduler function
- Next by thread: Re: hashed spinlocks
- Index(es):
