>
> > I recall that when Kai Germaschewski long time ago started the
> > unification of the vmlinux.lds files some people had boot problems
> > exactly because the label was defined inside the section and therefore
> > ld caused it to have another value as if it was placed outside the
> > section.
>
> I remember seeing something like that. I don't know if those problems
> apply to a modern ld, but it is certainly worth looking into.
I was googling a bit with no luck.
But apperantly looking at include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
I'm utterly wrong. It was the other way around that caused problems.
Placing the labels outside {} sometimes gave an unaligned start address,
whereas placing the label inside {} gave the correct address.
At his also makes sense. If ld decide to align a section then it will do
so after a label defined outside the section.
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |