> UML is still too strange for valgrind, despite progress on both sides
> (valgrind accepting more strange things and UML becoming less
> strange).
>
> I tried grinding UML a month or so ago, and its use of clone was a
> sticking point.
>
I think I read your remark, yes. Thanks for the update; I hoped some strides
had been made in that direction since then. Personally, I know to little
about the topic to be of any use.
I guess the best option is then using slab caches per object type, so that I
can at least find obvious memory leaks.
On a sidenote, it'll be interesting to see what valgrind reports once (if?)
the kernel gets a good grinding.
Willem
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |