Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers

On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 21:51 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > I think this is a good argument for leaving HZ at 1000 until some of
> > these userspace bugs are fixed.
> 
> WTF? HZ=1000 eats energy like crazy. artsd eats energy like crazy. And
> you advocate breaking kernel because artsd is broken?!

Also as Con's numbers demonstrate, from the interactivity POV it is you
who are breaking the kernel.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
    • From: Marc Ballarin <[email protected]>
  • Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
    • From: Marc Ballarin <[email protected]>
  • Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: 2.6.12 Stalls this is CC copy I forgot when mailing Andrew
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 0/15] lsm stacking v0.3: intro
• Previous by thread: Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
• Next by thread: Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]