Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers

On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 21:51 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > I think this is a good argument for leaving HZ at 1000 until some of
> > these userspace bugs are fixed.
> 
> WTF? HZ=1000 eats energy like crazy. artsd eats energy like crazy. And
> you advocate breaking kernel because artsd is broken?!

Also as Con's numbers demonstrate, from the interactivity POV it is you
who are breaking the kernel.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
  - From: Marc Ballarin <[email protected]>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
  - From: Marc Ballarin <[email protected]>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
  - From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: 2.6.12 Stalls this is CC copy I forgot when mailing Andrew
Next by Date: Re: [patch 0/15] lsm stacking v0.3: intro
Previous by thread: Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
Next by thread: Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]