Re: 2.6.13-rc4: no hyperthreading and idr_remove() stack traces

Andrew Morton <[email protected]> writes:

> Frank van Maarseveen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> 2.6.13-rc4 does not recognize the second CPU of a 3GHz HT P4:
>
> OK, we seem to have broken your APIC code.

There is a big difference here in that one kernel is using
the ACPI MADT tables and the other kernel is using the MP table.

I suspect the MP table on your system is incomplete while 
your ACPI MADT does specify both logical cpus. 

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.13-rc4: no hyperthreading and idr_remove() stack traces
  - From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>

References:
- 2.6.13-rc4: no hyperthreading and idr_remove() stack traces
  - From: Frank van Maarseveen <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.13-rc4: no hyperthreading and idr_remove() stack traces
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [patch 12/29] w1: kconfig/Makefile fix.
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386: vmlinux.lds.S Distinguish absolute symbols
Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.13-rc4: no hyperthreading and idr_remove() stack traces
Next by thread: Re: 2.6.13-rc4: no hyperthreading and idr_remove() stack traces
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]