Re: [ACPI] RE: Followup on 2.6.13-rc3 ACPI processor C-state regression

>Len, Kevin confirms that the below patch fixes the above regression for
>him.  Should we merge it now?

It also works for me.  Well, I'm not 100% sure it was that patch, but
2.6.13-rc3 on my TP 600X has the C2/C3 regression:

   ACPI: CPU0 (power states: C1[C1])

And 2.6.13-rc3-mm2, which includes that patch, works fine:

   ACPI: CPU0 (power states: C1[C1] C2[C2] C3[C3])

-Sanjoy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- RE: Followup on 2.6.13-rc3 ACPI processor C-state regression
  - From: "Brown, Len" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [patch 13/15] Minor SysRq keyboard bugfix for KGDB
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.12-rc6-mm1
Previous by thread: RE: Followup on 2.6.13-rc3 ACPI processor C-state regression
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/3] fix page-becoming-writable in do_wp_page
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]