RE: AACRAID failure with 2.6.13-rc1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Martin may be overplaying the performance angle.

A previous patch took the adapter from 64K to 4MB transaction sizes
across the board. This caused Martin's adapter and drive combination to
tip-over. We had to scale back to 128KB sized transactions to get
stability on his system. All systems handled the 4MB I/O size in our
tests, but the tests that were done some time ago were not performed
with the latest kernel, which contributed to a change in testing
corners.

Future patches associated with the 'new comm' interface will be able to
get finer grained performance tuning based on the adapter model rather
than the coarse method that currently resides in the more stable
kernels.

Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Morton [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 2:07 PM
To: Martin Drab
Cc: [email protected]; Salyzyn, Mark; [email protected]
Subject: Re: AACRAID failure with 2.6.13-rc1

. . .

ah, thanks.

A temporary workaround which might affct performance sounds better than
a
dead box though.

Mark, do you think that many systems are likely to be affected this way?

Do you think we should do something temporary for 2.6.13?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux