Re: Broke nice range for RLIMIT NICE

On 29 Jul 2005, Michael Kerrisk stated:
> Yes, as noted in my earlier message -- at the moment RLIMIT_NICE 
> still isn't in the current glibc snapshot...

According to traffic on libc-hacker, Ulrich committed it on Jun 20
(along with RLIMIT_RTPRIO support).

-- 
`Tor employs several thousand editors who they keep in dank
 subterranean editing facilities not unlike Moria' -- James Nicoll 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Broke nice range for RLIMIT NICE
    • From: "Michael Kerrisk" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Broke nice range for RLIMIT NICE
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: Broke nice range for RLIMIT NICE
    • From: "Michael Kerrisk" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] speed up on find_first_bit for i386 (let compiler do the work)
• Next by Date: [sched, patch] better wake-balancing, #2
• Previous by thread: Re: Broke nice range for RLIMIT NICE
• Next by thread: Re: Broke nice range for RLIMIT NICE
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]