On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 10:20:26AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 18:31 -0700, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 06:17:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > Yes, it does cause a crash.
>
> I don't know of any NUMA x86 sub-arches that have nodes which are
> aligned on any less than 2MB. Is this an architecture that's supported
> in the tree, today?
SRAT need not guarantee any alignment at all in the memory affinity
structure (the address in 64-bit byte address). And yes, there are x86-numa
machines that run the latest kernel tree and face this problem.
Thanks,
Kiran
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |