On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> What is the oldest gcc we want to support in kernel 2.6?
>
> Currently, it's 2.95 .
>
> I'd suggest raising this to 3.2 which should AFAIK not be a problem for
> any distribution supporting kernel 2.6 .
You have all my support for this. Some weird macros and code
could be removed from the tree. F.e. One could use [] instead of [0] and
there is a baaad macro in include/linux/mmzone.h in need of some healing
touches.
> Is there any good reason why we should not drop support for older
> compilers?
Probably but we should drop support anyways.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |