Re: [V9fs-developer] Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc3-mm2] v9fs: add fd based transport

On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> Couldn't the two other transports be implemented ontop of this one using
> a mount helper doing the pipe or tcp setup?

that's how we did it in the version we did for 2.4. I don't see why not.

ron
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [V9fs-developer] Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc3-mm2] v9fs: add fd based transport
    • From: Eric Van Hensbergen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 2.6.13-rc3-mm2] v9fs: add fd based transport
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc3-mm2] v9fs: add fd based transport
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Helpme WitCh Cpu Scaling. Hi People
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] New include file for marking old style api files
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc3-mm2] v9fs: add fd based transport
• Next by thread: Re: [V9fs-developer] Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc3-mm2] v9fs: add fd based transport
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]