Re: RFC: Raise required gcc version to 3.2 ?

Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> writes:

> Is there any good reason why we should not drop support for older 
> compilers?

Compilation speed? Don't know, using 3 (4?) years old Athlon 2000
it's not a problem unless I need full build 30 times a day.

But people on 266 MHz ARM5 may notice.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RFC: Raise required gcc version to 3.2 ?
    • From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)

• References:
  • RFC: Raise required gcc version to 3.2 ?
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Amd Mobile Sempron Problem
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.13-rc3-mm1 compiles unrequested/unconfigured module!
• Previous by thread: RFC: Raise required gcc version to 3.2 ?
• Next by thread: Re: RFC: Raise required gcc version to 3.2 ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]