On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 18:00 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > Don't you break sched_find_first_bit() , seems it's dependent on a > 140-bit bitmap . And doesn't POSIX specify 100 RT priority levels? Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Make MAX_RT_PRIO and MAX_USER_RT_PRIO configurable
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Make MAX_RT_PRIO and MAX_USER_RT_PRIO configurable
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH] Make MAX_RT_PRIO and MAX_USER_RT_PRIO configurable
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Make MAX_RT_PRIO and MAX_USER_RT_PRIO configurable
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH] Make MAX_RT_PRIO and MAX_USER_RT_PRIO configurable
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch] mm: Ensure proper alignment for node_remap_start_pfn
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.12: no sound on SPDIF with emu10k1
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Make MAX_RT_PRIO and MAX_USER_RT_PRIO configurable
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Make MAX_RT_PRIO and MAX_USER_RT_PRIO configurable
- Index(es):
