> +static int do_make_shared(struct vfsmount *mnt)
> +{
> + int err=0;
> + struct vfspnode *old_pnode = NULL;
> + /*
> + * if the mount is already a slave mount,
> + * allocate a new pnode and make it
> + * a slave pnode of the original pnode.
> + */
> + if (IS_MNT_SLAVE(mnt)) {
> + old_pnode = mnt->mnt_pnode;
> + pnode_del_slave_mnt(mnt);
> + }
> + if(!IS_MNT_SHARED(mnt)) {
> + mnt->mnt_pnode = pnode_alloc();
> + if(!mnt->mnt_pnode) {
> + pnode_add_slave_mnt(old_pnode, mnt);
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + pnode_add_member_mnt(mnt->mnt_pnode, mnt);
> + }
> + if(old_pnode)
> + pnode_add_slave_pnode(old_pnode, mnt->mnt_pnode);
> + set_mnt_shared(mnt);
> +out:
> + return err;
> +}
This is an example, where having struct pnode just complicates things.
If there was no struct pnode, this function would be just one line:
setting the shared flag.
> +static kmem_cache_t * pnode_cachep;
> +
> +/* spinlock for pnode related operations */
> + __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(vfspnode_lock);
> +
> +enum pnode_vfs_type {
> + PNODE_MEMBER_VFS = 0x01,
> + PNODE_SLAVE_VFS = 0x02
> +};
> +
> +void __init pnode_init(unsigned long mempages)
> +{
> + pnode_cachep = kmem_cache_create("pnode_cache",
> + sizeof(struct vfspnode), 0,
> + SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN|SLAB_PANIC, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +struct vfspnode * pnode_alloc(void)
> +{
> + struct vfspnode *pnode = kmem_cache_alloc(pnode_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pnode->pnode_vfs);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pnode->pnode_slavevfs);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pnode->pnode_slavepnode);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pnode->pnode_peer_slave);
> + pnode->pnode_master = NULL;
> + pnode->pnode_flags = 0;
> + atomic_set(&pnode->pnode_count,0);
> + return pnode;
> +}
> +
> +void inline pnode_free(struct vfspnode *pnode)
> +{
> + kmem_cache_free(pnode_cachep, pnode);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * __put_pnode() should be called with vfspnode_lock held
> + */
> +void __put_pnode(struct vfspnode *pnode)
> +{
> + struct vfspnode *tmp_pnode;
> + do {
> + tmp_pnode = pnode->pnode_master;
> + list_del_init(&pnode->pnode_peer_slave);
> + BUG_ON(!list_empty(&pnode->pnode_vfs));
> + BUG_ON(!list_empty(&pnode->pnode_slavevfs));
> + BUG_ON(!list_empty(&pnode->pnode_slavepnode));
> + pnode_free(pnode);
> + pnode = tmp_pnode;
> + if (!pnode || !atomic_dec_and_test(&pnode->pnode_count))
> + break;
> + } while(pnode);
> +}
> +
All these are really unnecessary IMO.
> +/*
> + * merge 'pnode' into 'peer_pnode' and get rid of pnode
> + * @pnode: pnode the contents of which have to be merged
> + * @peer_pnode: pnode into which the contents are merged
> + */
> +int pnode_merge_pnode(struct vfspnode *pnode, struct vfspnode *peer_pnode)
> +{
> + struct vfspnode *slave_pnode, *pnext;
> + struct vfsmount *mnt, *slave_mnt, *next;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(slave_pnode, pnext,
> + &pnode->pnode_slavepnode, pnode_peer_slave) {
> + slave_pnode->pnode_master = peer_pnode;
> + list_move(&slave_pnode->pnode_peer_slave,
> + &peer_pnode->pnode_slavepnode);
> + put_pnode_locked(pnode);
> + get_pnode(peer_pnode);
> + }
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(slave_mnt, next,
> + &pnode->pnode_slavevfs, mnt_pnode_mntlist) {
> + slave_mnt->mnt_pnode = peer_pnode;
> + list_move(&slave_mnt->mnt_pnode_mntlist,
> + &peer_pnode->pnode_slavevfs);
> + put_pnode_locked(pnode);
> + get_pnode(peer_pnode);
> + }
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(mnt, next,
> + &pnode->pnode_vfs, mnt_pnode_mntlist) {
> + mnt->mnt_pnode = peer_pnode;
> + list_move(&mnt->mnt_pnode_mntlist,
> + &peer_pnode->pnode_vfs);
> + put_pnode_locked(pnode);
> + get_pnode(peer_pnode);
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
Much overcomplication. It would just be a list_splice(), if there was
no struct pnode.
> +static void empty_pnode(struct vfspnode *pnode) { struct vfsmount *slave_mnt,
> + *next; struct vfspnode *master_pnode, *slave_pnode, *pnext;
> +
> + if ((master_pnode = pnode->pnode_master)) {
> + pnode->pnode_master = NULL;
> + list_del_init(&pnode->pnode_peer_slave);
> + pnode_merge_pnode(pnode, master_pnode);
> + put_pnode_locked(master_pnode);
> + } else {
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(slave_mnt, next,
> + &pnode->pnode_slavevfs, mnt_pnode_mntlist) {
> + list_del_init(&slave_mnt->mnt_pnode_mntlist);
> + set_mnt_private(slave_mnt);
> + put_pnode_locked(pnode);
> + }
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(slave_pnode, pnext,
> + &pnode->pnode_slavepnode, pnode_peer_slave) {
> + slave_pnode->pnode_master = NULL;
> + list_del_init(&slave_pnode->pnode_peer_slave);
> + put_pnode_locked(pnode);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
Unnecessary.
> +static int pnode_next(struct pcontext *context)
> +{
> + struct vfspnode *pnode = context->pnode;
> + struct vfspnode *master_pnode=context->master_pnode;
> + struct list_head *next;
> +
> + if (!pnode) {
> + BUG_ON(!context->start);
> + get_pnode(context->start);
> + context->pnode = context->start;
> + context->master_pnode = NULL;
> + context->level = 0;
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + spin_lock(&vfspnode_lock);
> + next = pnode->pnode_slavepnode.next;
> + if (next == &pnode->pnode_slavepnode) {
> + while (1) {
> + int flag;
> +
> + if (pnode == context->start) {
> + put_pnode_locked(pnode);
> + spin_unlock(&vfspnode_lock);
> + BUG_ON(context->level != 0);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + next = pnode->pnode_peer_slave.next;
> + flag = (next != &pnode->pnode_master->pnode_slavepnode);
> + put_pnode_locked(pnode);
> +
> + if (flag)
> + break;
> +
> + pnode = master_pnode;
> + master_pnode = pnode->pnode_master;
> + context->level--;
> + }
> + } else {
> + master_pnode = pnode;
> + context->level++;
> + }
> +
> + pnode = list_entry(next, struct vfspnode, pnode_peer_slave);
> + get_pnode(pnode);
> +
> + context->pnode = pnode;
> + context->master_pnode = master_pnode;
> + spin_unlock(&vfspnode_lock);
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * skip the rest of the tree, cleaning up
> + * reference to pnodes held in pnode_next().
> + */
> +static void pnode_end(struct pcontext *context)
> +{
> + struct vfspnode *p = context->pnode;
> + struct vfspnode *start = context->start;
> +
> + do {
> + put_pnode(p);
> + } while (p != start && (p = p->pnode_master));
> + return;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * traverse the pnode tree and at each pnode encountered, execute the
> + * pnode_fnc(). For each vfsmount encountered call the vfs_fnc().
> + *
> + * @pnode: pnode tree to be traversed
> + * @in_data: input data
> + * @out_data: output data
> + * @pnode_func: function to be called when a new pnode is encountered.
> + * @vfs_func: function to be called on each slave and member vfs belonging
> + * to the pnode.
> + */
> +static int pnode_traverse(struct vfspnode *pnode,
> + void *in_data,
> + void **out_data,
> + int (*pnode_pre_func)(struct vfspnode *,
> + void *, void **, va_list),
> + int (*pnode_post_func)(struct vfspnode *,
> + void *, va_list),
> + int (*vfs_func)(struct vfsmount *,
> + enum pnode_vfs_type, void *, va_list),
> + ...)
> +{
> + va_list args;
> + int ret = 0, level;
> + void *my_data, *data_from_master;
> + struct vfspnode *master_pnode;
> + struct vfsmount *slave_mnt, *member_mnt, *t_m;
> + struct pcontext context;
> + static void *p_array[PNODE_MAX_SLAVE_LEVEL];
> +
> + context.start = pnode;
> + context.pnode = NULL;
> + /*
> + * determine whether to process vfs first or the
> + * slave pnode first
> + */
> + while (pnode_next(&context)) {
> + level = context.level;
> +
> + if (level >= PNODE_MAX_SLAVE_LEVEL)
> + goto error;
> +
> + pnode = context.pnode;
> + master_pnode = context.master_pnode;
> +
> + if (master_pnode) {
> + data_from_master = p_array[level-1];
> + my_data = NULL;
> + } else {
> + data_from_master = NULL;
> + my_data = in_data;
> + }
> +
> + if (pnode_pre_func) {
> + va_start(args, vfs_func);
> + if((ret = pnode_pre_func(pnode,
> + data_from_master, &my_data, args)))
> + goto error;
> + va_end(args);
> + }
> +
> + // traverse member vfsmounts
> + spin_lock(&vfspnode_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(member_mnt,
> + t_m, &pnode->pnode_vfs, mnt_pnode_mntlist) {
> +
> + spin_unlock(&vfspnode_lock);
> + va_start(args, vfs_func);
> + if ((ret = vfs_func(member_mnt,
> + PNODE_MEMBER_VFS, my_data, args)))
> + goto error;
> + va_end(args);
> + spin_lock(&vfspnode_lock);
> + }
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(slave_mnt, t_m,
> + &pnode->pnode_slavevfs, mnt_pnode_mntlist) {
> +
> + spin_unlock(&vfspnode_lock);
> + va_start(args, vfs_func);
> + if ((ret = vfs_func(slave_mnt, PNODE_SLAVE_VFS,
> + my_data, args)))
> + goto error;
> + va_end(args);
> + spin_lock(&vfspnode_lock);
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&vfspnode_lock);
> +
> + if (pnode_post_func) {
> + va_start(args, vfs_func);
> + if((ret = pnode_post_func(pnode,
> + my_data, args)))
> + goto error;
> + va_end(args);
> + }
> +
> + p_array[level] = my_data;
> + }
> +out:
> + if (out_data)
> + *out_data = p_array[0];
> + return ret;
> +error:
> + va_end(args);
> + pnode_end(&context);
> + goto out;
> +}
>
And this is the worst part. As I said earlier, void pointers and
variable argument functions have no place in this kind of code.
I think you could get rid of all these if you'd implement a simple
iterator function which returns the traversed vfsmounts. That's
another big argument for getting rid of struct pnode: you could do
iteration simply by holding onto a vfsmount pointer, instead of having
to do a two level iteration, once over pnodes, then over vfsmounts.
> +extern spinlock_t vfspnode_lock;
> +extern void __put_pnode(struct vfspnode *);
> +
> +static inline struct vfspnode *
> +get_pnode(struct vfspnode *pnode)
> +{
> + if (!pnode)
> + return NULL;
> + atomic_inc(&pnode->pnode_count);
> + return pnode;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +put_pnode(struct vfspnode *pnode)
> +{
> + if (!pnode)
> + return;
> + if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&pnode->pnode_count, &vfspnode_lock)) {
> + __put_pnode(pnode);
> + spin_unlock(&vfspnode_lock);
> + }
> +}
Unnecessary.
> +#define MNT_PRIVATE 0x10 /* if the vfsmount is private, by default it is private*/
If by default it's private, why is this flag needed?
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |