On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:10:35AM -0700, Aleksey Gorelov wrote:
> > > static __init int via_router_probe(struct irq_router *r,
> >struct pci_dev *router, u16 device)
> > > {
> > > /* FIXME: We should move some of the quirk fixup stuff here */
> > > +
> > > + if (router->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C686 &&
> > > + device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_0) {
> > > + /* Asus k7m bios wrongly reports 82C686A as
> >586-compatible */
> > > + device = PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C686;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > switch(device)
> > > {
> > > case PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_0:
> >
> >If this really is a problem with that board, it should have a DMI entry
> >for that board alone, not for every VIA chipset that uses the
> >586/686 combo,
> >as I'm fairly certain there are some that legitimately use
> >this combination,
> >and the patch above will force them all to be reported as 82C686's.
>
> How can they use it legitimately if 586 & 686 routers are not
> programming register compatible ? Any board which reports that 686 is
> compatible with 586 will have that issue.
Actually now that I've woken up properly, your patch looks ok to me.
For some reason I was thinking we were comparing a north and south
bridge here.
Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |