On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 16:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i'm not excluding that this will become necessary in the future. We
> should also add the safety check to sched.h - all i'm suggesting is to
> not make it a .config option just now, because that tends to be fiddled
> with.
So Ingo, would you agree that at least this patch should go in?
-- Steve
(Patched against 2.6.12.2)
Index: vanilla_kernel/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- vanilla_kernel/include/linux/sched.h (revision 263)
+++ vanilla_kernel/include/linux/sched.h (working copy)
@@ -392,6 +392,10 @@
#define MAX_USER_RT_PRIO 100
#define MAX_RT_PRIO MAX_USER_RT_PRIO
+#if MAX_USER_RT_PRIO > MAX_RT_PRIO
+#error MAX_USER_RT_PRIO must not be greater than MAX_RT_PRIO
+#endif
+
#define MAX_PRIO (MAX_RT_PRIO + 40)
#define rt_task(p) (unlikely((p)->prio < MAX_RT_PRIO))
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |