Re: [patch 2.6.13-rc3a] i386: inline restore_fpu

[Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>]

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 at 11:13:21 -0700 (PDT), Linus Torvalds wrote:

> Something like the following (totally untested) should make it be
> non-lazy. It's going to slow down normal task switches, but might speed up 
> the "restoring FP context all the time" case.
> 
> Chuck? This should work fine with or without your inline thing. Does it 
> make any difference?

 Now that I am looking at the right output file -- yes, it does (after fixing
one small bug.)  Volanomark set a new record of 6125 messages/sec and the
profile shows almost zero hits in math_state_restore.

 Since fxsave leaves the FPU state intact, there ought to be a better way to do
this but it gets tricky.  Maybe using the TSC to put a timestamp in every thread
save area?

  when saving FPU state:
        put cpu# and timestamp in thread state info
        also store timestamp in per-cpu data

  on task switch:
        compare cpu# and timestamps for next task
        if equal, clear TS and set TS_USEDFPU

  when state becomes invalid for some reason:
        zero cpu's timestamp

But the extra overhead might be too much in many cases.


(Below is what I changed in the original patch, if anyone wants to try it.)

+               if (tsk_used_math(next_p))

should be:

+               if (!tsk_used_math(next_p))

__
Chuck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/