On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 13:55 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Doesn't matter. The cycles saved for old compilers is not rational to > have obfuscated code. Where do we draw the line with this? Is x *= 2 preferable to x <<= 2 as well? Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: xor as a lazy comparison
- From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
- Re: xor as a lazy comparison
- From: Paulo Marques <[email protected]>
- Re: xor as a lazy comparison
- From: Philippe Troin <[email protected]>
- Re: xor as a lazy comparison
- References:
- xor as a lazy comparison
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: xor as a lazy comparison
- From: Grant Coady <[email protected]>
- Re: xor as a lazy comparison
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: xor as a lazy comparison
- From: Puneet Vyas <[email protected]>
- Re: xor as a lazy comparison
- From: Bernd Petrovitsch <[email protected]>
- Re: xor as a lazy comparison
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- xor as a lazy comparison
- Prev by Date: RE: Variable ticks
- Next by Date: 2.6.12 sound problem
- Previous by thread: Re: xor as a lazy comparison
- Next by thread: Re: xor as a lazy comparison
- Index(es):
