Re: Supermount

> Supermount is obsolete there are other tools in userspace that do the
> job perfectly.
> e.g ivman which uses hal and dbus.

They cannot mount on demand, thus cannot do the same job. The boot
partition, for example, is something that should only be mounted when
required. The same obviously also goes for network filesystems in many
cases (i.e. avoid having zillion idling connections to the server).

> Also there are other fs like supermount e.g submount etc...

I woudldn't care about the implementation (original supermount,
supermountng, submount or something else). Getting the job done is what
counts.

- Tronic -

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Supermount
    • From: Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Supermount
    • From: Lasse Kärkkäinen / Tronic <[email protected]>
  • Re: Supermount
    • From: ioGL64NX <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Whats in this vaddr segment 0xffffe000-0xfffff000 ---p ?
• Next by Date: Re: NAPI (aka RX Polling) for natsemi?
• Previous by thread: Re: Supermount
• Next by thread: Re: Supermount
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]