>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2005-January/msg00742.html > >Interesting. This may seem reasonable for a Linux distribution, but less for those who compile kernelballs just for themselves. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Noob question. Why is the for-pentium4 kernel built with -march=i686 ?
- From: Ivan Yosifov <[email protected]>
- Re: Noob question. Why is the for-pentium4 kernel built with -march=i686 ?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Noob question. Why is the for-pentium4 kernel built with -march=i686 ?
- From: Ivan Yosifov <[email protected]>
- Re: Noob question. Why is the for-pentium4 kernel built with -march=i686 ?
- From: Kerin Millar <[email protected]>
- Re: Noob question. Why is the for-pentium4 kernel built with -march=i686 ?
- From: Ivan Yosifov <[email protected]>
- Noob question. Why is the for-pentium4 kernel built with -march=i686 ?
- Prev by Date: Re: amd64-agp vs. swsusp
- Next by Date: defconfig for v850, please
- Previous by thread: Re: Noob question. Why is the for-pentium4 kernel built with -march=i686 ?
- Next by thread: Possible GPL violation by PQI
- Index(es):
