Re: [PATCH] v850: const-qualify first parameter of find_next_zero_bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 17:38 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
[...]
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@
>  #define find_first_zero_bit(addr, size) \
>    find_next_zero_bit ((addr), (size), 0)
>  
> -extern __inline__ int find_next_zero_bit (void *addr, int size, int offset)
> +extern __inline__ int find_next_zero_bit(const void *addr, int size, int offset)
>  {
>  	unsigned long *p = ((unsigned long *) addr) + (offset >> 5);

Why not const-qualify *p and the cast also (avoiding warnings and
actually making the change complete)?

	Bernd
-- 
Firmix Software GmbH                   http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156                 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
          Embedded Linux Development and Services

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux