Re: Interbench real time benchmark results

On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 08:16 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> As a data point I went back to a 2.6.10 kernel which predates some
> latency fixes that went into mainline.
> 

I think most of the important ones had already gone in by then.  It
would be more interesting to compare it with 2.6.8.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Interbench real time benchmark results
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Separate non-i2c hwmon drivers from i2c-core (2/9)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 22/82] remove linux/version.h from drivers/message/fus ion
• Previous by thread: Re: Interbench real time benchmark results
• Next by thread: amd64 Interbench Results
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]