2005/7/18, Mark Gross <[email protected]>:
> On Friday 15 July 2005 16:14, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Mark Gross wrote:
> > > What would be wrong in expecting the folks making the driver changes
> > > have some story on how they are validating there changes don't break
> > > existing working hardware? I could probly be accomplished in open
> > > source with subsystem testing volenteers.
> >
> > Are you volunteering ?
>
> I am not volunteering. That last sentence was meant to say "It could
> probubly..."
>
> I'm just poking at a process change that would include a more formal
> validation / testing phase as part of getting change into the stable tree. I
> don't have any silver bullets.
I totaly agree with you, but the real problem is *how* to do that.
Do you have any suggestion ?
--
Paolo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |