Greg KH writes:
> I do care about this, please don't think that. But here's my reasoning
> for why it needs to go:
[...]
> - original developer of devfs has publicly stated udev is a
> replacement.
Well, that's news to me!
> - policy in the kernel.
Like sysfs :-)
> - clutter and mess
In the eye of the beholder.
> - code is broken and unfixable
No proof. Never say never...
Regards,
Richard....
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |