Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Karsten Wiese <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Have I corrected the other path of ioapic early initialization, which
>>had lacked virtual-address setup before ioapic_data[ioapic] was to be
>>filled in -51-28? Please test attached patch on top of -51-29 or
>>later. Also on Systems that liked -51-28.
>
>
> thanks - i've applied it to my tree and have released the -51-31 patch.
> It looks good on my testboxes.
>
> Ingo
>
I have booted this on my older SMP system (the one that wouldn't boot
-51-28) as well as an older duron box and thus far all is well.
--
kr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Realtime Preemption, 2.6.12, Beginners Guide?
- Re: Realtime Preemption, 2.6.12, Beginners Guide?
- Re: Realtime Preemption, 2.6.12, Beginners Guide?
- Re: Realtime Preemption, 2.6.12, Beginners Guide?
- Re: Realtime Preemption, 2.6.12, Beginners Guide?
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|