Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > Alan tested it and said that 250HZ does not save much power anyway.
> 
> Len Brown, a year ago: "The bottom line number to laptop users is battery
> lifetime.  Just today somebody complained to me that Windows gets twice the
> battery life that Linux does."
> 
> And "Maybe I can get Andy Grover over in the moble lab to get some time on
> that fancy power measurement setup they have...
> 
> "My expectation is if we want to beat the competition, we'll want the
> ability to go *under* 100Hz."
> 
> But then, power consumption of the display should preponderate, so it's not
> clear.
> 
> Len, any updates on the relationship between HZ and power consumption?

Last time I checked, HZ=100 to HZ=1000 difference was about 1W, about
twice as much as disk spinning up vs. disk spinned down.
								Pavel
-- 
teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux