On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 07:17:44PM -0700, Siddha, Suresh B wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 10:53:33AM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote: > > That said, I will be testing this patch a bit further > > Thanks. Let me know if you see any issues. > > > myself, and because it does address a real memory leak issue, we should > > consider it or another fix for stable 2.6.12.4. > > Appended patch will just fix the memory leak issue. Atleast, we should > apply this. Looks good. Thanks, Suresh. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [stable] Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes
- From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
- Re: [stable] Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes
- References:
- [00/11] -stable review
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
- [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
- Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
- Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes
- From: "Justin M. Forbes" <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>
- Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
- [00/11] -stable review
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.12 vs. /sbin/cardmgr
- Next by Date: Linux 2.6.12.3
- Previous by thread: Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes
- Next by thread: Re: [stable] Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes
- Index(es):
