2005-07-16 (Sat) 03:44 +0200 Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Removing the cache parameter from mb_cache_shrink would break when more than
> one mb_cache is used per filesystem, correct. Leaving the parameter in and
> adding your patch is more "future proof", so I'm fine with it. Are you
> actually using more than one mb_cache, or is this theoretical?
This is just theorecal.
Now I agree with your two patches except for the name of
"mb_cache_shrink". it should be renamed to imply that this function
shrinks all sort of mbcache on specified block device.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |