On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:38:54 -0700 Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 02:24:32PM -0700, randy_dunlap wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 07:56:36 -0700 Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > > When running depmod to check for the correct version number, extra
> > > output we don't need to see, such as "depmod: QM_MODULES: Function not
> > > implemented" may show up. Redirect stderr to /dev/null as the version
> > > information that we do care about comes to stdout.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> > > --- a/Makefile
> > > +++ b/Makefile
> > > @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ modules_install: _modinst_ _modinst_post
> > >
> > > .PHONY: _modinst_
> > > _modinst_:
> > > - @if [ -z "`$(DEPMOD) -V | grep module-init-tools`" ]; then \
> > > + @if [ -z "`$(DEPMOD) -V 2>/dev/null | grep module-init-tools`" ]; then \
> > > echo "Warning: you may need to install module-init-tools"; \
> > > echo "See http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/docs/post-halloween-2.6.txt";\
> > > sleep 1; \
> >
> > Well, seeing "QM_MODULES" is a great indicator that someone is using
> > modutils instead of module-init-tools, so I'd like to see it stay.
> > IOW, I somewhat disagree with "extra output we don't need to see."
>
> This shows up when building a 2.6 kernel with incorrect tools installed.
> What shows up when building a 2.6 kernel on a 2.4 machine that's
> properly setup to do both is "depmod: Can't open
> /lib/modules/.../modules.dep for writing".
I see. Thanks for clarifying. No problem then (with the patch).
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |