Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

> I wouldn't say it is totally impossible. There are ways in which Linux can work
> without a reliable Local APIC timer. One option being - make one CPU that gets 
> the external timer interrupt multicast an IPI to all the other CPUs that
> wants to get periodic timer interrupt.

That doesn't mix very well with variable ticks. And I believe
we really need them.

For no tick in idle you need a timer for each CPU that
can be programmed to a reasonably long interval to wake you
up after longer idleness. And all that
should work without bouncing cache lines around all the time
because that doesn't work on larger systems.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
    • From: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
    • From: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [rfc patch 2/2] direct-io: remove address alignment check
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]