On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 12:23 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > PI is always good, cause it allows the tracking of what is high
> > priority , and what is not .
>
> that's just plain wrong. PI might be good if one cares about priorities
> and worst-case latencies, but most of the time the kernel is plain good
> enough and we dont care. PI can also be pretty expensive. So in no way,
> shape or form can PI be "always good".
I don't agree with that. But of course I'm always speaking from a real
time perspective . PI is expensive , but it won't always be. However, no
one is forcing PI on anyone, even if I think it's good ..
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |